How to Master B2B Product-Led Growth Pricing: Part 1

James Wilton • August 19, 2024

Author

James Wilton

Managing Partner

Read Bio

PART 1

Product-led growth can be an effective strategy when your target is small and medium-sized businesses. However, to make it work, you need a B2B product-led growth pricing strategy, which is tricky to get right. 


To cut through the noise, James D. Wilton explains the 7 commandments of B2B PLG pricing.

In this article he delves into the first three commandments that focus on packaging.


Product-led growth (PLG) is undoubtedly on trend. A PLG strategy means that the product is the primary driver of customer acquisition, retention and upsell, replacing a traditional sales force. The benefits, when it works, are immense. The cost of customer acquisition (CAC) can be dramatically lower, and the revenue per employee (ARPU) significantly higher. 


PLG strategies are well-established in the B2C space, being the primary model used.  In B2B however, the traditional strategy is sales-led. This is partly because the larger transaction sizes can support or justify sales reps, and partly because of the size and complexity of Enterprise deals. Also, the demands for customization and attention from the customer mean that a salesperson is required to navigate the sales process effectively.

However, this breaks down somewhat in the SMB space. SMB buyers are still businesses, but they act a lot more like consumers.


Enterprise buyers are often professional purchasers and so have the time, attention, skills, and incentives to make sure they get the absolute best deal.


SMB buyers are often busy professionals who don’t have a lot of time to rigorously evaluate a deal across a large set of criteria. They often don’t want to speak to a sales rep. In a recent study for HR management software, 75% of buyers surveyed said they would not consider a vendor where they had to contact a salesperson to get a quote! 


Of course, SMB deal sizes are significantly lower than for Enterprises. There are a lot of potential buyers out there so PLG as a strategy is sensible.


On the other hand, SMB deals are still B2B buys, and retain some of these dynamics.  Most notably there is a range of willingness-to-pay across SMBs of different sizes.  While deal sizes are smaller than Enterprises, the transaction sizes are still typically larger than consumer purchases and often impactful on business budgets, so it’s still important for the buyer to have sufficient options and to feel the purchase aligns to value.


All-in-all, PLG makes a lot of sense for SMB buyers, but the B2B elements mean you have to build the pricing strategy somewhat differently.


At Monevate, we frequently work with SMB-focused SaaS companies using (or with aspirations to use) a PLG strategy to build out pricing strategies that will help achieve their business objectives. While every client is different and a pricing strategy needs to be fully tailored to their unique objectives, product build and market dynamics, there are a few elements we consider to be best practices that transcend other factors. 


We call this list of unbreakable laws:
The 7 Commandments of B2B PLG Pricing

'

The first three are on the topic of packaging


1. Keep packaging sufficiently simple and clear


The word “sufficiently” is key here. PLG pricing should always be simple, since you need customers to understand and decide quickly and easily.  Consumers typically require such a high degree of simplicity that anything more granular than a good-better-best strategy with ~3 tiers is likely too complicated. B2B buyers need simple choices too, but what is deemed “sufficiently” simple for an SMB buyer is typically more intricate than what qualifies for a consumer. 


This means that you have more wiggle room to capture value. Degrees of simplicity and monetization usually pull in opposite directions, and SMB buyers will often tolerate a packaging approach that is more granular and thus more monetizing.  A “base + modules” structure can be palatable, and more add-ons can be included without risking adoption.


Keep your packaging simple. But, not so simple that you unnecessarily reduce your value capture.

 2. Gate packages appropriately


For most SaaS businesses, year-over-year revenue growth is a key priority.  Upsells are an important driver of revenue growth, and a PLG strategy means your price structure does a lot of the heavy lifting in upselling the customer for you. If you are using tiers, being able to push customers to a higher tier is extremely valuable, and “gating” can help with that.


Gating essentially means placing some kind of capacity maximum – often number of users, or a certain measure of usage – on your tiers.


When the customer crosses the threshold, they are required to upgrade to the next tier.


Two notes of warning:

  1. It is extremely important to gate on metrics that the customer feels are linked to value, and acceptable as a basis for pricing. If this is not the case, the customer will feel aggrieved that they have to pay more (and presumably purchase features they may not want/need) based on an arbitrary metric.
  2. You must set the capacity at a level where you will upgrade a segment of customers with a higher willingness-to-pay. The best way to find this level is through market research, potentially leveraging conjoint analysis.
3.   Prioritize freemium over free trial

Freemium means creating a feature-limited or usage-limited free version of a product that can be used indefinitely.

A free trial provides free access to the product before the customer decides to purchase the product.


Both are good and viable strategies for customer acquisition but they are effective in different situations.


For a free trial to be effective, the customer needs to see enough value in the product over the trial period to decide to pull the trigger and make a purchase.  It’s often said that “customers don’t value what they can get for free” and, in our experience, that’s generally true.  This can mean that without significant attention from the vendor, customers often won’t engage in the trial – they may never use the product.  Consequently, free trials that are successful tend to involve a lot of direct support and guidance from the vendor, which is time consuming and expensive.


With freemium, the pressure to convert a customer in a short period of time goes away, since the customer can be on the free version indefinitely. This means that the customer-success motion to get them to engage and realize value can be handled in a less-intense, more product-led way. This works better for product-led strategies.

This relies on the vendor being able to create a free version that is sufficient valuable to secure the customer’s interest without providing so much value that it will be difficult to upgrade them to a “paid” version, which should ultimately be the objective.


“Reverse trials” are another idea many companies are now adopting. This is a model where the customer receives the “full” product for a short trial period, then is downgraded to the features/capacity limits of the free or first paid plan. This has the advantage of (a) providing a richer experience than the free version which will likely drive engagement and (b) helping the customer understand what they are missing on the lower tiers, thereby making conversion more likely.


---

 

Hopefully these three PLG pricing commandments have given you a good insight into the key considerations to bear in mind when putting together packages for your SMB market. 


Check out the second installment of this article, where we share the next four commandments which go beyond packaging to explore other important aspects of PLG pricing.

 

For a deeper dive Product Led Growth, watch our full masterclass on exactly this topic. Simply, join The Cube (our premiere pricing community) to gain free and instant access to this and all previous recordings, slides, transcripts, and tactical resources.

By James D. Wilton May 28, 2025
Outcome-based pricing (OBP) is one of the hottest topics in AI and SaaS monetization today. Instead of charging customers for access or usage, vendors charge based on measurable results. The idea? Customers only pay when they see real value. It sounds like the ultimate pricing model - perfectly aligned incentives, no wasted spend, and a direct link between cost and benefit. So why don’t more companies use it? Because in reality, OBP is much harder to execute than it looks. It’s been around for decades, but few companies truly succeed with it. That’s because OBP introduces complexity, risk, and friction that can make it more challenging than traditional SaaS models. Here are the five biggest pitfalls of OBP - and what to do about them. 1. Defining the Right Metric is Harder Than It Looks The biggest challenge in OBP is choosing a metric that accurately reflects value - without creating unintended consequences. If the vendor defines success too loosely, customers will feel overcharged. If the metric is too restrictive, vendors won’t get paid fairly. Example: Zendesk’s AI Ticket Resolution Pricing Zendesk introduced AI-powered customer service pricing based on resolved tickets. But customers pushed back - because Zendesk’s definition of a "resolution" didn’t always match what customers considered a real resolution. The lesson? A pricing metric must be: Meaningful to the customer (aligned with their definition of success). Tied to the vendor’s real value-add (not just surface-level activity). Difficult to game or manipulate (or customers will optimize against it). 2. Attribution is a Nightmare (Even with AI) Choosing the right metric is only part of the battle - there’s still another problem: Can you prove that YOUR product drove the result? In many cases, multiple factors contribute to an outcome. If revenue grows, was it because of the AI-powered sales tool, better sales reps, or an overall market uptick? Example: IBM Watson & Salesforce Einstein Both were positioned as transformational AI platforms, but customers struggled to isolate the AI’s impact. They could see business improvements, but couldn’t confidently say, “Watson/Einstein was responsible for X% of that success.” Notably, neither IBM nor Salesforce uses OBP for these products. Why? Attribution is too difficult. If vendors can’t prove they caused the outcome, customers won’t want to pay for it. A better approach: Control more of the process (the more your product influences the outcome, the easier it is to claim credit). Use proxy metrics (if direct attribution is hard, find leading indicators that correlate with success). Offer hybrid pricing (mix base fees with OBP so revenue isn’t fully dependent on attribution). 3. Baselining Gets Messy, Fast Even if a vendor picks the right metric AND can prove attribution, there’s yet another challenge: How do you measure improvement? The problem: Many OBP models assume a static baseline - but in reality, customer environments change over time. Example: Fraud Prevention in Financial Services Some AI vendors charge based on the reduction in fraudulent transactions. But this raises tough questions: What’s the starting fraud rate? (Pre-existing fraud levels may fluctuate.) Should the baseline reset each year? (If the vendor permanently reduces fraud, do they still get paid for maintaining it?) The lesson? Customers won’t want to pay for improvements they believe they would have achieved anyway. And vendors need a way to continuously justify their impact. A better approach: Define clear baseline periods (e.g. compare against the 6 months before implementation). Adjust pricing over time (the vendor’s impact might be front-loaded, requiring a different model in later years). Use tiered pricing (higher fees early, lower fees as impact normalizes). 4. Revenue Delays Can Kill a Vendor Even if everything else works - the metric is solid, attribution is clear, and baselining is fair - there’s still one big problem: Vendors often don’t get paid until months (or even years) after delivering value. This creates massive cash flow risks. Many SaaS companies depend on predictable, upfront revenue to fund operations. But OBP means revenue recognition is delayed, making forecasting difficult. Example: Riskified’s Outcome-Based Model Riskified, a fraud prevention platform, only gets paid when transactions are successfully approved without fraud. This aligns incentives - but it also means their revenue is inherently unpredictable. The lesson? While this approach works for Riskified, not every vendor can afford to wait for long-term verification before getting paid. (Note: Investors may not love it either - Riskified trades at just 1.89x EV/Revenue, a very low multiple for a SaaS company.) A better approach: Charge a mix of fixed fees + OBP to ensure steady cash flow. Offer performance tiers (higher base fees for lower-risk customers, full OBP for riskier bets). Use milestone-based payments - instead of waiting for full verification, charge in phases. 5. Customers Prefer Predictability - Even Over Potential Savings Even if an OBP model delivers better value, many customers still choose predictable pricing over variable costs. Why? Most businesses prefer stable, budgetable expenses over a fluctuating fee - even if the predictable price is technically more expensive. Example: Conversational AI in Customer Support A vendor offering an AI chatbot asked customers to choose between: Payment based on how many conversations the AI fully handled (OBP model). A flat subscription fee. Most customers chose the flat subscription. The lesson? Even if OBP is theoretically the best model, buyers often prefer predictability. The existence of an OBP option, however, can signal vendor confidence and reinforce the value of a fixed-price plan. A better approach: Give customers a choice (some will prefer OBP, but many want predictability). Use OBP as an anchor (show the OBP price, but steer customers toward a fixed option). Cap OBP costs to reduce buyer anxiety. Final Thoughts: OBP Works - But It’s Not for Everyone Outcome-based pricing sounds great in theory, but it’s tough to get right. When structured poorly, it leads to: Customer friction (over unclear metrics or unfair pricing). Revenue instability (due to attribution and baseline issues). Delayed payments (which can crush cash flow). The best OBP models: Pick the right metric - aligned to value and hard to manipulate. Solve the attribution problem - proving the vendor’s role in success. Balance cash flow - with a mix of fixed fees and variable components. OBP isn’t broken - but it’s not a magic bullet. Companies that embrace it need to go in with open eyes and a clear strategy. What’s your take? Have you seen OBP succeed or fail? Let’s discuss.
By Annika Li March 24, 2025
Customers love integrations but not paying for them. How to structure API pricing to align with perceived value while maintaining profitability?
By James Wilton March 18, 2025
AI has changed everything—from how we work to how we interact with technology.
By James Wilton February 11, 2025
The following is an edited excerpt from Capturing Value: The Definitive Guide to Transforming SaaS Pricing and Unshackling Growth, the new book by Monevate founder James D. Wilton.
By James Wilton October 1, 2024
James argues that Canva's 300% price increase for Teams is reasonable, but poor messaging, lacking empathy and fairness, fueled customer backlash, underscoring the need for better communication in SaaS pricing changes.
September 6, 2024
While GenAI remains the hotbed of innovation in tech, the level of innovation is not as high for AI’s pricing strategies - dive deep into GenAI pricing insights and strategies!
By James Wilton August 19, 2024
James D. Wilton's 7 B2B PLG Commandments guide effective pricing strategies for SMBs. After covering packaging in his first article, he now explores critical aspects of PLG pricing through commandments four to seven.
By Max Baughman August 14, 2024
Behind the scenes pricing is where the real money hides in plain sight and implicit price metrics are the unsung heroes of B2B SaaS revenue optimization. Learn all about them and how to ethically implement this powerful strategy.
By Santan Katragadda July 24, 2024
Is your pricing truly aligned with the value you deliver across all customer segments and usage levels? In this article we explore 7 unique price scaling models that can revolutionize your pricing architecture.
SHOW MORE